l a a r i s s s s a a ' s media arts blog.: January 2010
Jan
26
Larissa

The Dove Campaign for Real Beauty is a worldwide marketing campaign launched in 2004. It includes advertisements, video, workshops, sleepover events, etc. The main idea behind the campaign is to celebrate the natural unique physique that every woman poses and inspire them to develop confidence and self-esteem. Marketing and communications agencies such as Ogilvy & Mather, Edelman Public Relations, and Harbinger Communications (in Canada) hopped on board Dove’s idea. I believe this is what the world needs in a day and age where media can influence anybody’s mind. Everywhere you turn you see the media bombarding your minds with images that lie about natural beauty. If you repeat a lie to yourself over and over again, sooner or later it will begin to sound like the truth. It also applies with this, if you see photo-shopped picture of how beauty is defined then won’t your perspective of beauty be shaped by what you see, just like a child. With the aging population of kids we can’t afford for them to think of beauty that way. Their vision of beauty would be shaped by what they see on TV or everyday life. If they grew up living a lie then the truth will later be forgotten.At least there is a company out there that promotes natural beauty. (e.g. the ad with the old women says "too old to be in an anti-aging ad.")An example of Dove’s ads for real beauty would be the advertisement Dove Evolution which aired about 3 years ago.


CHECK IT OUT HERE ---> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYhCn0jf46U


After I saw this advertisement about 3 years ago, I was shocked, stunned, scared, etc. I was wondering, “OH MY GOD! THIS CAN’T BE REAL.” This is the perfect example of what the media is doing to us and by viewing these images we are shaping our definition of beauty with lies.


Now on the other hand, The Axe Effect Campaign, even though originating from the same company has an opposite view on beauty for men. I would say that this ad would be like the smoking ad that was used in the entry “ads of the past – did they really say that?” They play on the fact that men want to impress women and that if you do this or say this you can get whatever you want. But unlike the past now a day’s society is more educated and won’t fall for fake ads like this. I think this is ad is more humorous rather than serious. When I first saw the ad I died in laughter because it was so unrealistic. I think I’m just smarter than that to actually believe it, so to me I found it funny.


The parent company being one of 2009 World's Most Ethical Companies is totally bizarre because they have one company with extra values and the other with none. I don’t think it’s right because one does not balance out the other. I think there should be some basic set of beliefs or values that should be used. I think even though the products maybe different I think values are something that should be respected throughout.

Jan
25
Larissa
1. Fat! Fat! Fat!
This ad is sickening. Just even thinking about the person who must have thought about this. wow. They must have been really stupid. Tape worms are something that you want to remove from you system, not digest. GROSS! And to think that Americans would be dumb enough to fall for something so obviously bad for you. Clearly this ad looks pretty out dated and doesn't look like something that would be running today. I think that back then American society was uneducated compared to this day and age where we are smarter. This ad is focused on weight loss and now a days weight loss is a growing trend, with most of the Americans being over weight. I think ad is more fixated on the female gender. Since they are more health conscious compared to the males. Basically all women would consider themselves fat including the ones that are size 0. These ads are quite similar to weight loss ads today like Special K cereal would be one of millions out there.

2.Blow her in the face and she'll follow you anywhere.
Clearly this is an ad from the era when people used to think smoking is cool. They thought that holding a cigarette in your hand while the smokes escapes from you lips would make you the bad boy type. Well clearly they were wrong because those stupid teens now grew up to be no so pretty looking adults. I guess back then people would let them run this ad because advertising laws didn't come into place until years after. Now a days you won't find one cigarette ad that promotes it anywhere. Most of the cigarette ads out there are purely against smoking to prevent further damage of the next generation. I would say these ads were more leaning to the male gender even though women smoke too. But in comparison, there are many more male smokers. I think these ads promoted the fact that smoking was cool but in reality their the furthest thing from it.

3.They're Happy because they eat Lard.
This ad was quite funny to me in the beginning because I was like whoa, people back then must have been real dumb to think that eating basically fat is all that is needed to make a person happy.If you think about, doesn't it sound stupid? So here's another ad that proves that who ever bought Lard because of this ad was stupid. These ads reflect on the society and doesn't make it look smart at all. At the time, I tell you in my opinion the American's were dumb. There are no ads today that promote eating fat, with most of the American population already being over weight this would be the last thing they would need. With the picture of a family on it I would think that it is family oriented. Maybe feeding your kids lard will make them grow up healthier and happier. Maybe you wife too. I think was just stupidly funny if you think about who the hell would believe this? People back then. tssk tssk.

4.More Doctors Smoke Camels than any other cigarette.
Does smoking a cigarette brand that a doctor smoke make you any smarter? NO! That's the stupid thing I've ever heard other than the other couple previous ads. First of all, most doctors don't even smoke because they are well educated about all the health risk involved with smoking. Second of all, from the few doctors that smoke probably more then half smoke these "Camels" cigarette. It is like half of barely anything. There is no evidence backing up that theory then why believe it? Thirdly, if your thinking then why is there a man where a doctors outfit smoking in the ad? Its probably because he is not even a doctor, probably some paid actor.
This ad wouldn't be for any specific gender but rather for any smoker.I think that most of these ads were very vague and broke most of the advertising code that is now enforced. I am actually pretty surprise to see that this and the previous ads were ever shown in public.



Jan
25
Larissa
In my opinion, I think that the new Google Street View Map is a very innovative idea. When you first look at it, you’re mesmerized by it. At least I was. But I guess if you look hard enough you’ll find flaws with anything. With the evolving technology of the 21st century, it’s predictable that it will come with some complications. Google attaches a 360 degree camera on top of their van and drove around clicking pictures where they later put it in panoramic view. So now you are able to zoom to street level and roam around. But some pictures at street level contain images of people that some people can argue invade their privacy. Pictures of license plates, for example, I too agree, is a invasion of privacy but Google has done its part and blurred out the numbers and faces of people in an attempt to salvage some privacy. Let’s take a look at some of these photos of Google Street View.

Even though at first glance you may think that this is an invasion of privacy it is not. Because these girls are at a park which is public property thus making it perfectly fine. If they can sunbathe in a public area does it really matter if a photo is taken. It would be the same if I took a picture and posted it on the internet. But since their in public domain, oh well it's their fault, they'll know better next time.


Oh lookie here, what do we have? We have a man trying to break into a house. Isn't that a crime? Well see the street view doesn't only have to be used for bad things, there are much more positive things that it can be used for. To quote BO DIETL, FOMER NYPD DETECTIVE "1984, we had the Palm Sunday Massacre on Liberty Avenue, 10 people dead, eight kids. The guy who did the murder was parked out in front. We tried to get an ASTAT satellite reading of the car, we could not read the plate.If we could have, we could have known who the murderer was at that time. I think this is one of the most fabulous pieces of technology for law enforcement. It's beyond anything. I'm so happy."


With all these potentially embarrassing or private moments available to the entire world, the privacy question comes into play. Many people were bothered by the images they discovered in “Street View.” Google Spokeswoman Megan Quinn said, “This imagery is no different from what any person can readily capture or see walking down the street. Imagery of this kind is available in a wide variety of formats for cities all around the world.” Legal analysts believe that Google has every right to take pictures in public places so any lawsuits filed again the Internet giant would most likely be dismissed. Google also mentions that they have no intention of harming anyone with the new tool but helping. They have provided a way to submit a request that a certain image be removed if it causes any serious privacy concerns although they claim they have had very few removal requests. They are also working with different organizations to blur out any images where someone’s privacy or anonymity would be in jeopardy. Although most people probably find this mildly intrusive, it is a good sign of times to come in the changing world of technology.

source:http://www.romow.com/internet-blog/google-street-view-more-privacy-controversy-surrounding-google/
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,277140,00.html